The Conflict of Professional Golf
The Conflict of Professional Golf
Monday, April 17, 2023
PGA Tour vs LIV Golf
"Taking the easy way out." These are the words of PGA Tour member Rory Mcllroy on other tour members taking contracts and going to LIV Golf. Like Rory, there are other players, like Tiger Woods, that also do not agree with these golfers' decision to join LIV. Rory Mcllroy and Tiger Woods have both stated time and time again that those players are choosing money over prestige and tradition. The players that choose to go to LIV for money are just turning their back on what allowed them to get to this position. The most controversial part about this conflict is that the investors of the LIV Golf company are the Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund. Why, with all of the things that country has done for them, would they just want to go and join LIV Golf? Is it just for the money?
In this article they talk about how LIV Golf was started by Greg Norman in 2021 to try and compete with PGA that has been around since 1929. LIV golf has been trying to poach PGA Tour players since they started by guaranteeing them money even if they lose. The first person they got to join is Phil Mickelson buy paying him $200 million dollars, and they have gotten 17 more of the players from PGA since offering them upwards of $100 million each. PGA enacted a rule making permeant suspensions of these players and any other future players who participate in LIV events. This led to LIV filing a lawsuit against PGA for allegedly "using its power to stifle competition and punish defectors." That then led to the PGA filing a lawsuit against LIV and Saudi Public Investment Fund for "wrongly interfering in PGA's business by offering player millions of dollars to break their PGA contracts and play for LIV instead." To top it all off, there are a lot of PGA players that turned into LIV Golf players going public with how they feel about the situation. Several stated if they would have known that they would lose all association with the PGA, then they probably would have never even considered the offer from LIV Golf.
From reading this article, what is your opinion on LIV Golf being backed by a Saudi Arabian investor, given their history? Do you feel, after reading, that PGA is in the right or wrong? Most importantly, do you think PGA should keep their word on the players joining LIV not being able to come back, or do you think they should let the players that didn't know the repercussions of their actions come back and try to redeem their legacy in the PGA Tour?
Link: https://www.forbes.com.au/news/lifestyle/pga-v-liv-golf-what-you-need-to-know-about-golfs-messiest-rivalry/
Hello! I've learned quite about the drama that is surrounding the golfing world in this article. To start off, I don't really mind LIV being back by a Saudi Arabian investor. It seems like that's a very weird detail to include as well making the whole situation about betraying the country the PGA was founded in. I think the PGA is completely in the wrong and is abusing its power to keep a monopoly on pro golfers to themselves. I don't think pro golfers that 'defect' to another company should be permanently suspended as it kills the spirit of competition and gives the PGA more power.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your response!
DeleteThis article was very informative to be, as I had no idea about any of this. While it might be frowned upon for these golfers to "pick money over prestige", when you really think about it, this is their careers. They have the right to choose where they want to continue their careers. I feel like the PGA should give the players that went to the LIV a second chance. If they get to play with the PGA again maybe they will appreciate it more.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your response!
DeleteIn terms of career goals, aren't we all chasing that dollar sign. Yes in sport you need a degree of honor, but this is there lively hood and their family's lively hood. PGA has a great history and offers consistent paycheck, but maybe it wasn't enough. They gave these players a paycheck but how much did they make off these players in comparison? Maybe PGA with its history and high standing should evolve a little in order to keep their players. If PGA was in it for the players, fans, and sport they would be a bit more compromising.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your response!
DeleteFirstly, I had no idea there was any drama regarding golfing. The fact that it is a Saudi Arabia investor is interesting - only because of the current events surrounding the President of China and Vladimir Putin regarding trade and currency. Otherwise, if PGA isn't paying the same as LIV, I'd probably up and leave too. If its less work and more pay, most of us would take that gig - especially with the economy and inflation at what it is right now.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your response!
DeleteHello! I don't know much about golfing but this blog was very informative. I never know that golfing could be so interesting. I would think PGA would go above and beyond to keep their employees. This was very interesting again how golfing can be drama just like most sports. Thank you Jordan.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your response!
DeleteAs someone who loves to golf, I have been following this story. I think it's very interesting and I'm somewhat in the middle. I'm disappointed that a lot of the great competition of the game is leaving to join a somewhat suspicious organization, however, I understand making the best decision to make money. I think the fact that Liv is backed by a Saudi Arabian company is fine, however, I understand those who are not comfortable with the idea and do not want to join with it because of its history. I think PGA not allowing people to join back is very petty. Pettiness is an issue I have with the golf culture as a whole, however, as it pertains to this topic, I think it is ridiculous and that they should allow people to resign if they want to. I just want to see some good competition. Thanks for writing about a game I love!
ReplyDelete